You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
5001 lines
63 KiB
5001 lines
63 KiB
Confidence NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
pound NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
widely RB I-VP
|
|
expected VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
take VB I-VP
|
|
another DT B-NP
|
|
sharp JJ I-NP
|
|
dive NN I-NP
|
|
if IN B-SBAR
|
|
trade NN B-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
September NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
due JJ B-ADJP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
release NN B-NP
|
|
tomorrow NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
fail VB B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
show VB I-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
substantial JJ I-NP
|
|
improvement NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
July NNP B-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
August NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
near-record JJ I-NP
|
|
deficits NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Chancellor NNP O
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Exchequer NNP I-NP
|
|
Nigel NNP B-NP
|
|
Lawson NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
restated VBN I-NP
|
|
commitment NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
firm NN I-NP
|
|
monetary JJ I-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
helped VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
prevent VB I-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
freefall NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
over IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
past JJ I-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
But CC O
|
|
analysts NNS B-NP
|
|
reckon VBP B-VP
|
|
underlying VBG B-NP
|
|
support NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
been VBN I-VP
|
|
eroded VBN I-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
chancellor NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
failure NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
announce VB I-VP
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
new JJ I-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
measures NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
Mansion NNP I-NP
|
|
House NNP I-NP
|
|
speech NN I-NP
|
|
last JJ B-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
This DT B-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
increased VBN I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
risk NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
government NN I-NP
|
|
being VBG B-VP
|
|
forced VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
increase VB I-VP
|
|
base NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
16 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
current JJ I-NP
|
|
15 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
level NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
defend VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
pound NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
economists NNS B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
foreign JJ B-NP
|
|
exchange NN I-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
analysts NNS I-NP
|
|
say VBP B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
risks NNS I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
bad JJ I-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
figure NN I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
very RB B-ADVP
|
|
heavily RB I-ADVP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
down JJ I-NP
|
|
side NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Chris NNP B-NP
|
|
Dillow NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
senior JJ B-NP
|
|
U.K. NNP I-NP
|
|
economist NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Nomura NNP B-NP
|
|
Research NNP I-NP
|
|
Institute NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
If IN B-SBAR
|
|
there EX B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
another DT B-NP
|
|
bad JJ I-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
number NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
there EX B-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
awful JJ I-NP
|
|
lot NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
pressure NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
noted VBD B-VP
|
|
Simon NNP B-NP
|
|
Briscoe NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
U.K. NNP B-NP
|
|
economist NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
Midland NNP B-NP
|
|
Montagu NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
unit NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Midland NNP B-NP
|
|
Bank NNP I-NP
|
|
PLC NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Forecasts NNS B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
range VBP B-VP
|
|
widely RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
but CC O
|
|
few JJ B-NP
|
|
economists NNS I-NP
|
|
expect VBP B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
data NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
show VB I-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
very RB I-NP
|
|
marked VBN I-NP
|
|
improvement NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT O
|
|
# # O
|
|
2 CD O
|
|
billion CD O
|
|
-LRB- ( O
|
|
$ $ B-ADJP
|
|
3.2 CD O
|
|
billion CD O
|
|
-RRB- ) O
|
|
deficit NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
current JJ I-NP
|
|
account NN I-NP
|
|
reported VBD B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
August NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
August NNP I-NP
|
|
deficit NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
# # I-NP
|
|
2.2 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
gap NN I-NP
|
|
registered VBN B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
July NNP B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
topped VBN I-VP
|
|
only RB B-ADVP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
# # I-NP
|
|
2.3 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
deficit NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
October NNP B-NP
|
|
1988 CD I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Sanjay NNP B-NP
|
|
Joshi NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
European JJ B-NP
|
|
economist NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Baring NNP B-NP
|
|
Brothers NNPS I-NP
|
|
& CC I-NP
|
|
Co. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
there EX B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
no DT B-NP
|
|
sign NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
Britain NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
manufacturing NN I-NP
|
|
industry NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
transforming VBG I-VP
|
|
itself PRP B-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
boost VB I-VP
|
|
exports NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
same JJ I-NP
|
|
time NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
remains VBZ B-VP
|
|
fairly RB B-ADJP
|
|
pessimistic JJ I-ADJP
|
|
about IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
outlook NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
imports NNS B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
given VBN B-PP
|
|
continued VBD B-NP
|
|
high JJ I-NP
|
|
consumer NN I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
capital NN I-NP
|
|
goods NNS I-NP
|
|
inflows NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
He PRP B-NP
|
|
reckons VBZ B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
current JJ I-NP
|
|
account NN I-NP
|
|
deficit NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
narrow VB I-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
only RB B-NP
|
|
# # I-NP
|
|
1.8 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
September NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
However RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Dillow NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
believes VBZ B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
reduction NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
raw JJ B-NP
|
|
material NN I-NP
|
|
stockbuilding VBG I-NP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
industry NN B-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
lead VB I-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
sharp JJ I-NP
|
|
drop NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
imports NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Combined VBN B-PP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
at IN B-ADVP
|
|
least JJS I-ADVP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
rebound NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
exports NNS B-NP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
August NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
unexpected JJ I-NP
|
|
decline NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
deficit NN I-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
narrow VB I-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
as RB B-NP
|
|
little JJ I-NP
|
|
as IN I-NP
|
|
# # I-NP
|
|
1.3 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Briscoe NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
who WP B-NP
|
|
also RB B-ADVP
|
|
forecasts VBZ B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
# # I-NP
|
|
1.3 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
current JJ I-NP
|
|
account NN I-NP
|
|
gap NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
warns VBZ B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
even RB B-SBAR
|
|
if IN I-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
bullish JJ B-ADJP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
currency NN I-NP
|
|
wo MD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
advance VB I-VP
|
|
much JJ B-NP
|
|
because IN B-SBAR
|
|
investors NNS B-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
want VB I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
see VB I-VP
|
|
further JJ B-NP
|
|
evidence NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
turnaround NN I-NP
|
|
before IN B-PP
|
|
adjusting VBG B-VP
|
|
positions NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Nevertheless RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
noted VBD B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
No DT B-NP
|
|
one PRP I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
want VB I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
go VB I-VP
|
|
into IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
without IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
flat JJ I-NP
|
|
position NN I-NP
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
pound NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
overall JJ B-NP
|
|
evidence NN I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
economy NN I-NP
|
|
remains VBZ B-VP
|
|
fairly RB B-ADJP
|
|
clouded VBN I-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
Mansion NNP I-NP
|
|
House NNP I-NP
|
|
speech NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Lawson NNP I-NP
|
|
warned VBD B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
further JJ I-NP
|
|
slowdown NN I-NP
|
|
can MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
expected VBN I-VP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
impact NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
last JJ I-NP
|
|
rise NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
interest NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
earlier RBR B-NP
|
|
this DT I-NP
|
|
month NN I-NP
|
|
takes VBZ B-VP
|
|
effect NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
U.K. JJ B-NP
|
|
base NN I-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
highest JJS I-NP
|
|
level NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
eight CD B-NP
|
|
years NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
But CC O
|
|
consumer NN B-NP
|
|
expenditure NN I-NP
|
|
data NNS I-NP
|
|
released VBD B-VP
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
do VBP B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
suggest VB I-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
U.K. NNP I-NP
|
|
economy NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
slowing VBG I-VP
|
|
that DT B-ADVP
|
|
quickly RB I-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
show VBP B-VP
|
|
that DT O
|
|
spending NN B-NP
|
|
rose VBD B-VP
|
|
0.1 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
third JJ I-NP
|
|
quarter NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
second JJ I-NP
|
|
quarter NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
3.8 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
ago RB B-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
This DT B-NP
|
|
compares VBZ B-VP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
1.6 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
rise NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
second NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
first JJ I-NP
|
|
quarter NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
5.4 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
increase NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
second JJ I-NP
|
|
quarter NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
1988 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Dillow NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
data NNS I-NP
|
|
show VBP B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
economy NN I-NP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
still RB B-ADVP
|
|
quite RB B-ADJP
|
|
strong JJ I-ADJP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
but CC O
|
|
suggestions NNS B-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
much NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
spending NN I-NP
|
|
went VBD B-VP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
services NNS B-NP
|
|
rather RB B-PP
|
|
than IN I-PP
|
|
consumer NN B-NP
|
|
goods NNS I-NP
|
|
should MD B-VP
|
|
reduce VB I-VP
|
|
fears NNS B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
more JJR B-NP
|
|
import NN I-NP
|
|
rises NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Certainly RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
chancellor NN I-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
made VBN I-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
clear JJ B-ADJP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
prepared VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
increase VB I-VP
|
|
interest NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
again RB B-ADVP
|
|
if IN B-SBAR
|
|
necessary JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
both DT I-VP
|
|
ensure VB I-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
substantial JJ I-NP
|
|
slowdown NN I-NP
|
|
does VBZ B-VP
|
|
take VB I-VP
|
|
place NN B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
that DT O
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
does VBZ B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
decline VB I-VP
|
|
further JJ B-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
reminded VBD B-VP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
audience NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
government NN I-NP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
can MD B-VP
|
|
not RB I-VP
|
|
allow VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
necessary JJ I-NP
|
|
rigor NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
monetary JJ B-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
undermined VBN I-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
exchange NN B-NP
|
|
rate NN I-NP
|
|
weakness NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
|
|
Analysts NNS B-NP
|
|
agree VBP B-VP
|
|
there EX B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
little JJ B-NP
|
|
holding NN B-VP
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
firm NN B-ADJP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
moment NN I-NP
|
|
other JJ B-ADJP
|
|
than IN B-PP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Lawson NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
promise NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
pushed VBN I-VP
|
|
higher JJR B-ADJP
|
|
if IN B-SBAR
|
|
necessary JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
And CC O
|
|
, , O
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
warn VBP B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
further JJ I-NP
|
|
drop NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
government NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
popularity NN I-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
swiftly RB I-VP
|
|
make VB I-VP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
promise NN I-NP
|
|
sound NN B-VP
|
|
hollow JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Sterling NNP B-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
already RB I-VP
|
|
showing VBG I-VP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
signs NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
lack NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
confidence NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Lawson NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
promise NN I-NP
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
European JJ B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
declined VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
1.5890 CD I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
2.9495 CD B-NP
|
|
marks NNS I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
1.5940 CD I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
2.9429 CD B-NP
|
|
marks NNS I-NP
|
|
late JJ B-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Economists NNS B-NP
|
|
suggested VBD B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
if IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
pound NN I-NP
|
|
falls VBZ B-VP
|
|
much JJ B-NP
|
|
below IN B-PP
|
|
2.90 CD B-NP
|
|
marks NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
government NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
forced VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
increase VB I-VP
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
16 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
both DT B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
halt VB B-VP
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
further JJ I-NP
|
|
decline NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
ensure VB B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
balance NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
monetary JJ B-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
remains VBZ B-VP
|
|
unchanged JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
Market NNP I-NP
|
|
Activity NN I-NP
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
dollar NN I-NP
|
|
posted VBD B-VP
|
|
gains NNS B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
quiet JJ B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
concerns NNS B-NP
|
|
about IN B-PP
|
|
equities NNS B-NP
|
|
abated VBN B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Foreign JJ B-NP
|
|
exchange NN I-NP
|
|
dealers NNS I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
currency NN I-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
begun VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
distance VB I-VP
|
|
itself PRP B-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
volatile JJ I-NP
|
|
stock NN I-NP
|
|
exchange NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
preoccupied VBN I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
since IN B-PP
|
|
Oct. NNP B-NP
|
|
13 CD I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
when WRB B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Dow NNP I-NP
|
|
Jones NNP I-NP
|
|
Industrial NNP I-NP
|
|
Average NNP I-NP
|
|
plunged VBD B-VP
|
|
more JJR B-NP
|
|
than IN I-NP
|
|
190 CD I-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Currency NN B-NP
|
|
analysts NNS I-NP
|
|
predict VBP B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
coming VBG I-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
foreign JJ I-NP
|
|
exchange NN I-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
shift VB I-VP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
focus NN I-NP
|
|
back RB B-ADVP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
economic JJ B-NP
|
|
fundamentals NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
keeping VBG B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
close NN I-NP
|
|
eye NN I-NP
|
|
out IN B-ADVP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
signs NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
monetary JJ B-NP
|
|
easing NN I-NP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
Federal NNP I-NP
|
|
Reserve NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Late RB B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
New NNP I-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
dollar NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
quoted VBN I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
1.8578 CD B-NP
|
|
marks NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
1.8470 CD B-NP
|
|
marks NNS I-NP
|
|
late JJ B-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
currency NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
also RB I-VP
|
|
changing VBG I-VP
|
|
hands NNS B-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
142.43 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
141.70 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
late JJ B-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
Tokyo NNP B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
Monday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
currency NN I-NP
|
|
opened VBD B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
trading NN B-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
141.95 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
Tokyo NNP I-NP
|
|
close NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
141.35 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
On IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Commodity NNP I-NP
|
|
Exchange NNP I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
gold NN B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
current JJ B-NP
|
|
delivery NN I-NP
|
|
settled VBD B-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
367.30 CD I-NP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
ounce NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
20 CD B-NP
|
|
cents NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Estimated VBN B-NP
|
|
volume NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
light NN I-NP
|
|
2.4 CD I-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
ounces NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
early JJ B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Hong NNP B-NP
|
|
Kong NNP I-NP
|
|
Monday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
gold NN B-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
quoted VBN I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
366.50 CD I-NP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
ounce NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
East NNP B-NP
|
|
Rock NNP I-NP
|
|
Partners NNP I-NP
|
|
Limited NNP I-NP
|
|
Partnership NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
proposed VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
acquire VB I-VP
|
|
A.P. NNP B-NP
|
|
Green NNP I-NP
|
|
Industries NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
40 CD I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
share NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
Oct. NNP I-NP
|
|
19 CD I-NP
|
|
letter NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
A.P. NNP B-NP
|
|
Green NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
board NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
East NNP B-NP
|
|
Rock NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
offer NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
subject NN B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
signing NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
merger NN I-NP
|
|
agreement NN I-NP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
no DT B-ADVP
|
|
later RB I-ADVP
|
|
than IN B-PP
|
|
Oct. NNP B-NP
|
|
31 CD I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
letter NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
attached VBN B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
filing NN I-NP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Securities NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Exchange NNP I-NP
|
|
Commission NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
approval NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
also RB B-ADVP
|
|
contingent JJ B-ADJP
|
|
upon IN B-PP
|
|
obtaining VBG B-VP
|
|
satisfactory JJ B-NP
|
|
financing NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
An DT B-NP
|
|
A.P. NNP I-NP
|
|
Green NNP I-NP
|
|
official NN I-NP
|
|
declined VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
comment VB I-VP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
filing NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
$ $ I-NP
|
|
40-a-share JJ I-NP
|
|
proposal NN I-NP
|
|
values VBZ B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
about RB B-NP
|
|
$ $ I-NP
|
|
106.6 CD I-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
A.P. NNP B-NP
|
|
Green NNP I-NP
|
|
currently RB B-ADVP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
2,664,098 CD B-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
outstanding JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
stock NN I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
38 CD I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
1.875 CD I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
national JJ B-NP
|
|
over-the-counter JJ I-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
Mexico NNP I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
Mo. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
maker NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
refractory JJ B-NP
|
|
products NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
East NNP B-NP
|
|
Rock NNP I-NP
|
|
also RB B-ADVP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
filing NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
boosted VBD B-VP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
stake NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
A.P. NNP B-NP
|
|
Green NNP I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
8.7 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
now RB B-ADVP
|
|
holds VBZ B-VP
|
|
233,000 CD B-NP
|
|
A.P. NNP I-NP
|
|
Green NNP I-NP
|
|
common JJ I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
including VBG B-PP
|
|
30,000 CD B-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
bought VBD B-VP
|
|
last JJ B-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
35.50 CD I-NP
|
|
to TO I-NP
|
|
$ $ I-NP
|
|
36.50 CD I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
share NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York-based JJ I-NP
|
|
John NNP I-NP
|
|
Kuhns NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Robert NNP I-NP
|
|
MacDonald NNP I-NP
|
|
control NN B-VP
|
|
East NNP B-NP
|
|
Rock NNP I-NP
|
|
Partners NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
sole JJ I-NP
|
|
general JJ I-NP
|
|
partner NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
East NNP B-NP
|
|
Rock NNP I-NP
|
|
Partners NNP I-NP
|
|
L.P NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
sole JJ I-NP
|
|
limited JJ I-NP
|
|
partner NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
partnership NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
Westwood NNP B-NP
|
|
Brick NNP I-NP
|
|
Lime NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
indirect JJ I-NP
|
|
subsidiary NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Westwood NNP B-NP
|
|
Group NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Both DT B-NP
|
|
Westwood NNP B-NP
|
|
Brick NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Westwood NNP B-NP
|
|
Group NNP I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
based VBN I-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Boston NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Freight NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
declining VBG B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
most RBS B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
decade NN I-NP
|
|
because IN B-PP
|
|
of IN I-PP
|
|
competition NN B-NP
|
|
spurred VBN B-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
deregulation NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
bottoming VBG I-VP
|
|
out IN B-PRT
|
|
, , O
|
|
turning VBG B-VP
|
|
upward RB B-ADVP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
threatening VBG B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
fuel VB I-VP
|
|
inflation NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Trucking NNP B-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
shipping VBG I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
air-freight NN I-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
announced VBN I-VP
|
|
rate NN B-NP
|
|
increases NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
scheduled VBN B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
fall NN I-NP
|
|
or CC O
|
|
early JJ B-NP
|
|
next JJ I-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
reflecting VBG B-VP
|
|
higher JJR B-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
tightened VBD B-NP
|
|
demand NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
freight NN B-NP
|
|
transport NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Major JJ B-NP
|
|
shippers NNS I-NP
|
|
say VBP B-VP
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
expect VBP B-VP
|
|
freight NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
rise VB I-VP
|
|
at IN B-ADVP
|
|
least JJS I-ADVP
|
|
as RB B-ADVP
|
|
fast RB I-ADVP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
inflation NN B-NP
|
|
and CC B-ADVP
|
|
maybe RB I-ADVP
|
|
faster RBR B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
next JJ I-NP
|
|
few JJ I-NP
|
|
years NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
That DT B-NP
|
|
's VBZ B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
big JJ I-NP
|
|
change NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
recent JJ B-NP
|
|
years NNS I-NP
|
|
when WRB B-ADVP
|
|
freight NN B-NP
|
|
haulage NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
bright JJ I-NP
|
|
spot NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
productivity NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
helping VBG B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
restrain VB I-VP
|
|
inflation NN B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
make VB B-VP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
industry NN I-NP
|
|
more RBR B-ADJP
|
|
competitive JJ I-ADJP
|
|
abroad RB B-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
Demand NN B-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
caught VBN I-VP
|
|
up IN B-PRT
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
supply NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
certain JJ B-NP
|
|
types NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
freight NN B-NP
|
|
transportation NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
and CC O
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
starting VBG I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
move VB I-VP
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
rate NN I-NP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
close RB B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
or CC O
|
|
slightly RB B-ADJP
|
|
more JJR I-ADJP
|
|
than IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
inflation NN I-NP
|
|
rate NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Clifford NNP B-NP
|
|
Sayre NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
director NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
logistics NNS B-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Du NNP B-NP
|
|
Pont NNP I-NP
|
|
Co NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
surveyed VBN B-VP
|
|
recently RB B-ADVP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
Ohio NNP B-NP
|
|
State NNP I-NP
|
|
University NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
expect VBP B-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
freight-transport JJ I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
storage NN I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
distribution NN I-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
rise VB I-VP
|
|
about IN B-NP
|
|
4 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Only RB B-NP
|
|
10 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
250 CD I-NP
|
|
shippers NNS I-NP
|
|
polled VBN B-VP
|
|
expected VBN B-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
freight-transport JJ I-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
decrease VB I-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
compared VBN B-PP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
30 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
who WP B-NP
|
|
had VBD B-VP
|
|
looked VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
freight VB B-NP
|
|
transport NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
reduce VB I-VP
|
|
costs NNS B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
past JJ B-NP
|
|
years NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
This DT B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
first JJ I-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
since IN B-PP
|
|
transportation NN B-NP
|
|
deregulation NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
1980 CD B-NP
|
|
that IN B-ADVP
|
|
we PRP B-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
had VBN I-VP
|
|
such JJ B-NP
|
|
a DT I-NP
|
|
dramatic JJ I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
broad-based JJ I-NP
|
|
upturn NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
perceived VBN B-NP
|
|
transportation NN I-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Bernard NNP B-NP
|
|
LaLonde NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
transportation NN I-NP
|
|
logistics NNS I-NP
|
|
professor NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Ohio NNP B-NP
|
|
State NNP I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Columbus NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
deregulation NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
railroads NNS B-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
trucking NN I-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
began VBD B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
1980 CD B-NP
|
|
enabled VBD B-VP
|
|
shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
bargain VB I-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
transportation NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Carriers NNP B-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
use VB I-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
equipment NN I-NP
|
|
more RBR B-ADVP
|
|
efficiently RB I-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
leading VBG B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
overcapacity NN B-NP
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
eager JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
fill VB I-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
cut VBP B-VP
|
|
about RB B-NP
|
|
$ $ I-NP
|
|
35 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
annual JJ I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
inter-city JJ I-NP
|
|
truck NN I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
rail NN I-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
about RB B-NP
|
|
$ $ I-NP
|
|
150 CD I-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
or CC O
|
|
about IN B-NP
|
|
6.4 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
gross JJ B-NP
|
|
national JJ I-NP
|
|
product NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
down RB B-ADVP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
8 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
GNP NNP B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
1981 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
But CC O
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
much NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
inefficiency NN I-NP
|
|
squeezed VBN B-VP
|
|
out IN B-PP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
freight-transport JJ I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
rising VBG B-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
likely JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
reflected VBN I-VP
|
|
directly RB B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
higher JJR B-NP
|
|
freight NN I-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
Shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
saying VBG I-VP
|
|
` `` O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
party NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-VP
|
|
over IN B-ADJP
|
|
, , O
|
|
' '' O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
LaLonde NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
Shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
wo MD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
able JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
look VB I-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
transportation-cost JJ B-NP
|
|
savings NNS I-NP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
last JJ I-NP
|
|
eight CD I-NP
|
|
or CC I-NP
|
|
nine CD I-NP
|
|
years NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Transport NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
wo MD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
opportunity NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
offsetting VBG B-VP
|
|
cost NN B-NP
|
|
increases NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
other JJ B-NP
|
|
segments NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
economy NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
|
|
Robert NNP B-NP
|
|
Delaney NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
consultant NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Arthur NNP B-NP
|
|
D. NNP I-NP
|
|
Little NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Cambridge NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mass. NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
We PRP B-NP
|
|
've VBP B-VP
|
|
gotten VBN I-VP
|
|
all PDT B-NP
|
|
the DT I-NP
|
|
benefits NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
deregulation NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
freight-cost JJ B-NP
|
|
reductions NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Now RB B-ADVP
|
|
we PRP B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
starting VBG I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
see VB I-VP
|
|
real JJ B-NP
|
|
freight-rate JJ I-NP
|
|
increases NNS I-NP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
carriers NNS B-NP
|
|
replace VBP B-VP
|
|
equipment NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
pay VB B-VP
|
|
higher JJR B-NP
|
|
fuel NN I-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
pay VB B-VP
|
|
more JJR B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
labor NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
You PRP B-NP
|
|
'll MD B-VP
|
|
see VB I-VP
|
|
carriers NNS B-NP
|
|
try VB B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
recoup VB I-VP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
price NN I-NP
|
|
cutting VBG I-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
occurred VBD B-VP
|
|
previously RB B-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
|
|
Not RB B-NP
|
|
everyone NN I-NP
|
|
believes VBZ B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
good JJ I-NP
|
|
times NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
over IN B-ADJP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
There EX B-NP
|
|
's VBZ B-VP
|
|
still RB B-ADVP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
lot NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
pressure NN B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
both DT B-NP
|
|
rail NN I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
truck NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Gerard NNP B-NP
|
|
McCullough NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
lecturer NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
transportation NN B-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Massachusetts NNP B-NP
|
|
Institute NNP I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Technology NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Less-than-truckload JJ B-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
carry VBP B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
freight NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
several JJ B-NP
|
|
shippers NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
each DT B-NP
|
|
truck NN I-NP
|
|
trailer NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
discounted VBD B-VP
|
|
away RB B-ADVP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
4.7 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
rate NN I-NP
|
|
increase NN I-NP
|
|
implemented VBD B-VP
|
|
last JJ B-NP
|
|
April NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
carriers NNS I-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
competing VBG I-VP
|
|
fiercely RB B-ADVP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
market NN B-NP
|
|
share NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Railroad-rate JJ B-NP
|
|
increases NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
likely JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
restrained VBN I-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
weakening VBG B-NP
|
|
rail-traffic JJ I-NP
|
|
levels NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
keen JJ B-NP
|
|
competition NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
freight NN B-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
trucks NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
An DT B-NP
|
|
official NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Consolidated NNP B-NP
|
|
Freightways NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
Menlo NNP I-NP
|
|
Park NNP I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
Calif. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
less-than-truckload JJ I-NP
|
|
carrier NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
rate NN B-NP
|
|
discounting NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
that DT B-NP
|
|
industry NN I-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
begun VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
stabilize VB B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
|
|
Consolidated NNP B-NP
|
|
Freightways NNP I-NP
|
|
plans VBZ B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
raise VB I-VP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
5.3 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
late JJ B-NP
|
|
this DT I-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
or CC O
|
|
early JJ B-NP
|
|
next JJ I-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
and CC O
|
|
at IN B-NP
|
|
least JJS I-NP
|
|
two CD I-NP
|
|
competitors NNS I-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
announced VBN I-VP
|
|
similar JJ B-NP
|
|
increases NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Truckers NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
trying VBG B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
send VB I-VP
|
|
signals NNS B-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
need VBP B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
stop VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
bloodletting NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
forget VB B-VP
|
|
about IN B-PP
|
|
market NN B-NP
|
|
share NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
go VB B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
higher JJR B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Michael NNP B-NP
|
|
Lloyd NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
analyst NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Salomon NNP B-NP
|
|
Bros NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
And CC O
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
shippers NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
getting VBG I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
feeling NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
played VBN I-VP
|
|
one CD B-NP
|
|
trucker NN I-NP
|
|
off IN B-ADVP
|
|
against IN B-PP
|
|
another DT B-NP
|
|
as RB B-NP
|
|
much JJ I-NP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
can MD B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Air-freight NN B-NP
|
|
carriers NNS I-NP
|
|
raised VBD B-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
products NNS I-NP
|
|
going VBG B-VP
|
|
across IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Pacific NNP I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
Asia NNP B-NP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
about IN B-NP
|
|
20 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
earlier RBR B-NP
|
|
this DT I-NP
|
|
month NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
And CC O
|
|
Japan NNP B-NP
|
|
Air NNP I-NP
|
|
Lines NNPS I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
plans VBZ B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
boost VB I-VP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
further JJ I-NP
|
|
25 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
over IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
next JJ I-NP
|
|
two CD I-NP
|
|
years NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Such JJ B-NP
|
|
rate NN I-NP
|
|
increases NNS I-NP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
increase VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
total JJ I-NP
|
|
cost NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
products NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
slow JJ B-VP
|
|
down RP B-PRT
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
rate NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
increase NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
exports NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Richard NNP B-NP
|
|
Connors NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
senior JJ I-NP
|
|
vice NN I-NP
|
|
president NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Yusen NNP B-NP
|
|
Air NNP I-NP
|
|
& CC I-NP
|
|
Sea NNP I-NP
|
|
Service NNP I-NP
|
|
U.S.A. NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
air-freight-forwarding JJ I-NP
|
|
subsidiary NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Nippon NNP B-NP
|
|
Yusen NNP I-NP
|
|
Kaisha NNP I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Japan NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Ship NN B-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
carrying VBG B-VP
|
|
bulk NN B-NP
|
|
commodities NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
such JJ B-PP
|
|
as IN I-PP
|
|
oil NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
grain NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
coal NN B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
iron NN B-NP
|
|
ore NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
been VBN I-VP
|
|
able JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
increase VB I-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
last JJ I-NP
|
|
couple NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
years NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Some DT B-NP
|
|
bulk NN I-NP
|
|
shipping VBG I-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
increased VBN I-VP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
3 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
to TO I-NP
|
|
4 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
past JJ I-NP
|
|
few JJ I-NP
|
|
months NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Salomon NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
Mr. NNP I-NP
|
|
Lloyd NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
And CC O
|
|
ship NN B-NP
|
|
lines NNS I-NP
|
|
carrying VBG B-VP
|
|
containers NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
also RB I-VP
|
|
trying VBG I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
raise VB I-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Carriers NNP B-NP
|
|
boosted VBD B-VP
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
more JJR B-NP
|
|
than IN I-NP
|
|
10 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
North NNP I-NP
|
|
Atlantic NNP I-NP
|
|
between IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Europe NNP B-NP
|
|
last JJ B-NP
|
|
September NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
hoping VBG B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
partly RB I-VP
|
|
restore VB I-VP
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
earlier JJR B-NP
|
|
levels NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Ship NN B-NP
|
|
lines NNS I-NP
|
|
operating VBG B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Pacific NNP I-NP
|
|
plan NN B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
raise VB I-VP
|
|
rates NNS B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
containers NNS B-NP
|
|
carrying VBG B-VP
|
|
U.S. NNP B-NP
|
|
exports NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
Asia NNP B-NP
|
|
about IN B-NP
|
|
10 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
effective JJ B-ADJP
|
|
next JJ B-NP
|
|
April NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
MGM NNP B-NP
|
|
Grand NNP I-NP
|
|
Inc. NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
filed VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
registration NN I-NP
|
|
statement NN I-NP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Securities NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Exchange NNP I-NP
|
|
Commission NNP I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
public JJ I-NP
|
|
offering NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
six CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
common JJ I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
Beverly NNP I-NP
|
|
Hills NNP I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
Calif.-based JJ I-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
would MD B-VP
|
|
have VB I-VP
|
|
26.9 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
common JJ I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
outstanding JJ B-ADJP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
offering NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
hotel NN I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Gaming NNP I-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Merrill NNP B-NP
|
|
Lynch NNP I-NP
|
|
Capital NNP I-NP
|
|
Markets NNPS I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
lead VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
underwriters NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Proceeds NNS B-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
sale NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
used VBN I-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
remodeling VBG B-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
refurbishing VBG I-NP
|
|
projects NNS I-NP
|
|
, , B-PP
|
|
as RB I-PP
|
|
well RB I-PP
|
|
as IN I-PP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
planned VBN I-NP
|
|
MGM NNP I-NP
|
|
Grand NNP I-NP
|
|
hotel\/casino NN I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
theme NN I-NP
|
|
park NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Bob NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
stewed JJ B-VP
|
|
over IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
letter NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
manager NN I-NP
|
|
putting VBG B-VP
|
|
him PRP B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
probation NN B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
insubordination NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
thought VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
discipline NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
unfair JJ B-ADJP
|
|
; : O
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
believed VBD B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
manager NN I-NP
|
|
wanted VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
get VB I-VP
|
|
rid JJ B-ADJP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
him PRP B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
personal JJ B-NP
|
|
reasons NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Unable JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
persuade VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
manager NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
change VB I-VP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
decision NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
went VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
`` `` I-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
hearing NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
scheduled VBN I-NP
|
|
time NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
entered VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
conference NN I-NP
|
|
room NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
building NN I-NP
|
|
near IN B-PP
|
|
where WRB B-ADVP
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
worked VBD B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
After IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
three CD I-NP
|
|
members NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
introduced VBD B-VP
|
|
themselves PRP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
chairman NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
panel NN I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
: : O
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
Go VB B-VP
|
|
ahead RB B-ADVP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
tell VB B-VP
|
|
us PRP B-NP
|
|
what WP B-NP
|
|
happened VBD B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
We PRP B-NP
|
|
may MD B-VP
|
|
ask VB I-VP
|
|
questions NNS B-NP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
you PRP B-NP
|
|
go VBP B-VP
|
|
along IN B-PRT
|
|
, , O
|
|
or CC O
|
|
we PRP B-NP
|
|
may MD B-VP
|
|
wait VB I-VP
|
|
until IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
end NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
|
|
No DT B-NP
|
|
lawyers NNS I-NP
|
|
or CC I-NP
|
|
tape NN I-NP
|
|
recorders NNS I-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
present JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
only RB I-NP
|
|
extra JJ I-NP
|
|
people NNS I-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
couple NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
specialists NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
one CD B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
whom WP B-NP
|
|
knew VBD B-VP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
case NN I-NP
|
|
intimately RB B-ADVP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
would MD B-VP
|
|
help VB I-VP
|
|
fill VB I-VP
|
|
in IN B-PRT
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
facts NNS I-NP
|
|
needed VBN B-VP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
give VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
full JJ I-NP
|
|
picture NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Over IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
cup NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
coffee NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
told VBD B-VP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
story NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
He PRP B-NP
|
|
talked VBD B-VP
|
|
about IN B-NP
|
|
20 CD I-NP
|
|
minutes NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
When WRB B-ADVP
|
|
he PRP B-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
through IN B-ADJP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
members NNS I-NP
|
|
asked VBD B-VP
|
|
many JJ B-NP
|
|
questions NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
then RB B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
chairman NN I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
would MD B-VP
|
|
like VB I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
hear VB I-VP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
manager NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
side NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
talk VB B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
witnesses NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
chairman NN I-NP
|
|
promised VBD B-VP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
decision NN I-NP
|
|
within IN B-PP
|
|
two CD B-NP
|
|
weeks NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Bob NNP B-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
fictional JJ I-NP
|
|
name NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
but CC O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
incident NN I-NP
|
|
described VBN B-VP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
real JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
happened VBD B-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Northrop NNP B-NP
|
|
Corp. NNP I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Los NNP B-NP
|
|
Angeles NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
called VBN I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Management NNP I-NP
|
|
Appeals NNP I-NP
|
|
Committee NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
or CC O
|
|
just RB B-NP
|
|
`` `` I-NP
|
|
MAC NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
and CC O
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
likely JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
hear VB I-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
couple NN I-NP
|
|
of IN I-NP
|
|
dozen NN I-NP
|
|
cases VBZ I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Alter VB B-VP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
details NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
example NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
taking VBG I-VP
|
|
place NN B-NP
|
|
today NN B-ADVP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Federal NNP B-NP
|
|
Express NNP I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Memphis NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Defense NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Underseas NNP I-NP
|
|
Systems NNP I-NP
|
|
divisions NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Honeywell NNP B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Minneapolis NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
General NNP I-NP
|
|
Electric NNP I-NP
|
|
plant NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Columbia NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Md. NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
or CC O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
number NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
other JJ B-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
These DT B-NP
|
|
firms NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
pioneers NNS B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
significant JJ I-NP
|
|
new JJ I-NP
|
|
trend NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
corporate JJ I-NP
|
|
world NN I-NP
|
|
: : O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
rise NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
what WP B-NP
|
|
I PRP B-NP
|
|
call VBP B-VP
|
|
corporate JJ B-NP
|
|
due JJ I-NP
|
|
process NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Although IN B-SBAR
|
|
corporate JJ B-NP
|
|
due JJ I-NP
|
|
process NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
practiced VBN I-VP
|
|
today NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
few JJ B-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
-- : O
|
|
perhaps RB B-ADVP
|
|
40 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO I-NP
|
|
60 CD I-NP
|
|
-- : O
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
one CD B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
fastest JJS I-NP
|
|
developing VBG I-NP
|
|
trends NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
industry NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
coming VBG I-NP
|
|
decade NN I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
majority NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
people-oriented JJ B-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
likely JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
adopt VB I-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Corporate JJ B-NP
|
|
due JJ I-NP
|
|
process NN I-NP
|
|
appeals NNS B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
management NN B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
variety NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
reasons NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
reduces VBZ B-VP
|
|
lawsuits NNS B-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
disgruntled JJ B-NP
|
|
employees NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
ex-employees NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
all DT B-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
means VBZ B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
reduced VBN B-NP
|
|
legal JJ I-NP
|
|
costs NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
better RBR B-NP
|
|
public JJ I-NP
|
|
relations NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
helps VBZ B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
keep VB I-VP
|
|
out IN B-PRT
|
|
unions NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
increases VBZ B-VP
|
|
employee NN B-NP
|
|
commitment NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
all DT B-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
means VBZ B-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
efficiency NN B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
quality NN B-NP
|
|
control NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
What WP B-NP
|
|
must MD O
|
|
your PRP$ B-NP
|
|
management NN I-NP
|
|
team NN I-NP
|
|
do VBP B-VP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
establish VB I-VP
|
|
corporate JJ B-NP
|
|
due JJ I-NP
|
|
process NN I-NP
|
|
? . O
|
|
|
|
Here RB B-ADVP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
four CD B-NP
|
|
key JJ I-NP
|
|
steps NNS I-NP
|
|
: : O
|
|
|
|
1 CD B-LST
|
|
. . O
|
|
Make VB B-VP
|
|
sure JJ B-ADJP
|
|
you PRP B-NP
|
|
have VBP B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
strong JJ I-NP
|
|
personnel NNS I-NP
|
|
department NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
must MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
able JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
handle VB I-VP
|
|
most RBS B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
complaints NNS I-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
can MD B-VP
|
|
not RB I-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
solved VBN I-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
trenches NNS I-NP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
managers NNS B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
subordinates NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
else RB B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
or CC I-NP
|
|
adjudicators NNS I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
be VB B-VP
|
|
inundated VBN I-VP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
cases NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
Polaroid NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Personnel NNP I-NP
|
|
Policy NNP I-NP
|
|
Planning NNP I-NP
|
|
Committee NNP I-NP
|
|
may MD B-VP
|
|
hear VB I-VP
|
|
only RB B-NP
|
|
about IN I-NP
|
|
20 CD I-NP
|
|
cases VBZ I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
; : O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
rest NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
many JJ I-NP
|
|
hundreds NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
complaints NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
resolved VBN I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
earlier JJR B-NP
|
|
stages NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
TWA NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
System NNP I-NP
|
|
Board NNP I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Adjustment NNP B-NP
|
|
hears VBZ B-VP
|
|
50 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO I-NP
|
|
75 CD I-NP
|
|
cases VBZ I-NP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
only RB B-NP
|
|
a DT I-NP
|
|
fraction NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
complaints NNS I-NP
|
|
brought VBN B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
specialists NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
Citicorp NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Problem NNP I-NP
|
|
Review NNP I-NP
|
|
Board NNP I-NP
|
|
may MD B-VP
|
|
hear VB I-VP
|
|
only RB B-NP
|
|
12 CD I-NP
|
|
or CC I-NP
|
|
so RB I-NP
|
|
cases VBZ I-NP
|
|
because IN B-PP
|
|
of IN I-PP
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
skill NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
complaint-resolution NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
typical JJ I-NP
|
|
year NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-NP
|
|
to TO I-NP
|
|
20 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
work NN I-NP
|
|
force NN I-NP
|
|
goes VBZ B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
specialists NNS I-NP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
complaints NNS B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
unfair JJ B-NP
|
|
treatment NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
large JJ I-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
means VBZ B-VP
|
|
many JJ B-NP
|
|
hundreds NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
complaints NNS B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
handle VB I-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
2 CD B-LST
|
|
. . O
|
|
Formally RB B-ADVP
|
|
or CC I-ADVP
|
|
informally RB I-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
train NN B-VP
|
|
all DT B-NP
|
|
your PRP$ I-NP
|
|
managers NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
supervisors NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
due-process NN I-NP
|
|
approach NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
See VB B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
know VBP B-VP
|
|
company NN B-NP
|
|
personnel NNS I-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
backwards RB B-ADVP
|
|
and CC I-ADVP
|
|
forwards RB I-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
for IN O
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
`` `` I-NP
|
|
law NN I-NP
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
governing VBG B-VP
|
|
company NN B-NP
|
|
courts NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
adjudicators NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Coach NNP B-VP
|
|
them PRP B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
handling NN B-VP
|
|
complaints NNS B-NP
|
|
so RB B-SBAR
|
|
that IN I-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
can MD B-VP
|
|
resolve VB I-VP
|
|
problems NNS B-NP
|
|
immediately RB B-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-SBAR
|
|
case NN O
|
|
managers NNS B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
specialists NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
unsuccessful JJ B-ADJP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
subordinates NNS B-NP
|
|
take VBP B-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
complaints NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
court NN I-NP
|
|
or CC I-NP
|
|
adjudicator NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
teach VB B-VP
|
|
managers NNS B-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
accept VB I-VP
|
|
reversals NNS B-NP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
fact NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
business NN B-NP
|
|
life NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
for IN O
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
good JJ I-NP
|
|
due-process NN I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
bound VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
happen VB I-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
15 CD I-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
I PRP B-NP
|
|
studied VBD B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
reversal NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
range VBP B-VP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
average NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
20 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
40 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
3 CD B-LST
|
|
. . O
|
|
Decide VB B-VP
|
|
whether IN O
|
|
you PRP B-NP
|
|
want VBP B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
panel NN I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
or CC O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
single JJ I-NP
|
|
adjudicator NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
A DT B-NP
|
|
panel NN I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
like IN B-PP
|
|
that DT B-NP
|
|
in NN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Bob NNP I-NP
|
|
Stone NNP I-NP
|
|
example NN I-NP
|
|
enjoys VBZ B-VP
|
|
such JJ B-NP
|
|
advantages NNS I-NP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
high JJ B-NP
|
|
credibility NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
, , O
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
panelists NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
mutual JJ B-NP
|
|
support NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
An DT B-NP
|
|
adjudicator NN I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
-- : O
|
|
that DT B-INTJ
|
|
is VBZ I-INTJ
|
|
, , O
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
investigator NN I-NP
|
|
who WP B-NP
|
|
acts VBZ B-VP
|
|
first JJ B-ADVP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
fact-finder NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
then RB O
|
|
switches VBZ B-VP
|
|
hats NNS B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
arbitrates VBZ B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
facts NNS I-NP
|
|
-- : O
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
such JJ B-NP
|
|
advantages NNS I-NP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
speed NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
flexibility NN B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
maximum JJ B-NP
|
|
privacy NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
International NNP B-NP
|
|
Business NNP I-NP
|
|
Machines NNPS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Bank NNP B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
America NNP B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
among IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
companies NNS I-NP
|
|
using VBG B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
single-adjudicator JJ I-NP
|
|
approach NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
4 CD B-LST
|
|
. . O
|
|
Make VB B-VP
|
|
your PRP$ B-NP
|
|
due-process NN I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
visible JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
It PRP B-NP
|
|
wo MD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
do VB I-VP
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
good NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
anybody NN B-NP
|
|
unless IN B-SBAR
|
|
employees NNS B-NP
|
|
know VBP B-VP
|
|
about IN B-PP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Most JJS B-NP
|
|
managements NNS I-NP
|
|
hesitate VBP B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
go VB I-VP
|
|
all DT B-ADVP
|
|
out NN I-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
advertising VBG B-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
due-process NN I-NP
|
|
systems NNS I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
fear NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
encouraging VBG B-VP
|
|
cranks NNS B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
chronic JJ B-NP
|
|
soreheads NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
file VB I-VP
|
|
complaints NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
On IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
other JJ I-NP
|
|
hand NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
make VBP B-VP
|
|
sure JJ B-ADJP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
minimum NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
systems NNS I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
described VBN I-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
employee NN I-NP
|
|
handbooks NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
talked VBD B-VP
|
|
up IN B-PRT
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
personnel NNS B-NP
|
|
specialists NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Smith-Kline NNP B-NP
|
|
Beecham NNP I-NP
|
|
goes VBZ B-VP
|
|
further JJ B-ADVP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
sometimes RB B-VP
|
|
features VBZ I-VP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
grievance NN I-NP
|
|
procedure NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
closed-circuit JJ B-NP
|
|
TV NN I-NP
|
|
programs NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Naturally RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
one CD B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
best JJS I-NP
|
|
ways NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
guarantee VB I-VP
|
|
visibility NN B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
your PRP$ B-NP
|
|
due-process NN I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
for IN B-SBAR
|
|
top JJ B-NP
|
|
management NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
support VB I-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
IBM NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
Open NNP I-NP
|
|
Door NNP I-NP
|
|
system NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
sometimes RB B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
subject NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
memorandums NNS B-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
chief JJ I-NP
|
|
executive NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Federal NNP B-NP
|
|
Express NNP I-NP
|
|
goes VBZ B-VP
|
|
further JJ B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
respect NN I-NP
|
|
than IN B-PP
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
I PRP B-NP
|
|
know VBP B-VP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
both DT B-NP
|
|
Frederick NNP B-NP
|
|
Smith NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
James NNP B-NP
|
|
Barksdale NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
chief JJ B-NP
|
|
executive NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
chief JJ B-NP
|
|
operating VBG I-NP
|
|
officer NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
respectively RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
sitting VBG B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PRT
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Appeals NNP I-NP
|
|
Board NNP I-NP
|
|
almost RB B-NP
|
|
every DT I-NP
|
|
Tuesday NNP I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
decide VB I-VP
|
|
cases NNS B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Ewing NNP I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
consultant NN I-NP
|
|
based VBN B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Winchester NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mass. NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
and CC O
|
|
author NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
Justice NNP B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Job NNP I-NP
|
|
: : O
|
|
Resolving NNP B-VP
|
|
Grievances NNP B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Nonunion NNP I-NP
|
|
Workplace NN I-NP
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
-LRB- ( O
|
|
Harvard NNP B-NP
|
|
Business NNP I-NP
|
|
School NNP I-NP
|
|
Press NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
1989 CD B-NP
|
|
-RRB- ) O
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Tokyo NNP B-NP
|
|
stocks NNS I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
higher JJR B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
active JJ B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
marking VBG B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
fourth JJ I-NP
|
|
consecutive JJ I-NP
|
|
daily JJ I-NP
|
|
gain NN I-NP
|
|
since IN B-PP
|
|
Monday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
sharp JJ I-NP
|
|
fall NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
London JJ B-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
moderately RB B-ADVP
|
|
lower JJR I-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
thin JJ B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
At IN B-PP
|
|
Tokyo NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
225 CD B-NP
|
|
selected VBN I-NP
|
|
issues NNS I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
112.16 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
35486.38 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
advanced VBD B-VP
|
|
266.66 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
early JJ B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Tokyo NNP B-NP
|
|
Monday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
rose VBD B-VP
|
|
101.98 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
35588.36 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
volume NN I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
First NNP I-NP
|
|
Section NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
estimated VBN I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
one CD B-NP
|
|
billion CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
862 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Winners NNS B-NP
|
|
outpaced VBD B-VP
|
|
losers NNS B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
572 CD B-ADVP
|
|
to TO I-ADVP
|
|
368 CD I-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
while IN B-SBAR
|
|
181 CD B-NP
|
|
issues NNS I-NP
|
|
remained VBD B-VP
|
|
unchanged JJ B-ADJP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
With IN B-SBAR
|
|
investors NNS B-NP
|
|
relieved VBN B-ADJP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
overnight JJ I-NP
|
|
gain NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
stocks NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
small-lot JJ B-NP
|
|
buying NN I-NP
|
|
orders NNS I-NP
|
|
streamed VBD B-VP
|
|
into IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
early JJ B-NP
|
|
morning NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
making VBG B-VP
|
|
traders NNS B-NP
|
|
believe VBP B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
back RB B-ADVP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
normal JJ B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
reached VBD B-VP
|
|
as RB B-ADJP
|
|
high JJ I-ADJP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
35611.38 CD B-NP
|
|
right NN B-ADVP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
opening NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
surrendered VBD B-VP
|
|
part NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
early JJ I-NP
|
|
advance NN I-NP
|
|
toward IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
end NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
because IN B-PP
|
|
of IN I-PP
|
|
profit-taking NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
`` `` O
|
|
Investors NNS B-NP
|
|
, , B-NP
|
|
especially RB I-NP
|
|
dealers NNS B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
do VBP B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
want VB I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
hold VB I-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
position NN I-NP
|
|
over IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
weekend NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
'' '' O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
trader NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
Dai-ichi NNP B-NP
|
|
Securities NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
adding VBG B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
though RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
mood NN I-NP
|
|
remained VBD B-VP
|
|
positive JJ B-ADJP
|
|
through IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
afternoon NN I-NP
|
|
session NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
Tokyo NNP I-NP
|
|
Stock NNP I-NP
|
|
Price NNP I-NP
|
|
Index NNP I-NP
|
|
-LRB- ( O
|
|
Topix NNP B-NP
|
|
-RRB- ) O
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
all DT B-NP
|
|
issues NNS I-NP
|
|
listed VBN B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
First NNP I-NP
|
|
Section NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
gained VBD B-VP
|
|
22.78 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
14.06 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
or CC O
|
|
0.53 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
2679.72 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
Second JJ I-NP
|
|
Section NN I-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
rose VBD B-VP
|
|
15.72 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
11.88 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
or CC O
|
|
0.32 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
close VB I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
3717.46 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Volume NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
second JJ I-NP
|
|
section NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
estimated VBN I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
30 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
28 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
turmoil NN B-NP
|
|
caused VBN B-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
the DT O
|
|
previous JJ B-NP
|
|
Friday NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
plunge NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
stocks NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
marked VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
sharp JJ I-NP
|
|
647.33-point JJ I-NP
|
|
fall NN I-NP
|
|
Monday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
But CC O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
fell VBD B-VP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
overall JJ I-NP
|
|
1.8 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
value NN B-NP
|
|
that DT B-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
compared VBN B-PP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
Wall NNP B-NP
|
|
Street NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS I-NP
|
|
far RB B-ADJP
|
|
sharper JJR I-ADJP
|
|
6.9 CD B-ADJP
|
|
% NN I-ADJP
|
|
drop NN B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
Oct. NNP B-NP
|
|
13 CD I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
Tokyo NNP I-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
resiliency NN I-NP
|
|
helped VBD B-VP
|
|
participants NNS B-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
regain VB I-VP
|
|
confidence NN B-NP
|
|
gradually RB B-ADVP
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
spent VBD B-VP
|
|
more JJR B-NP
|
|
time NN I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
analyzing VBG B-VP
|
|
factors NNS B-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
caused VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Friday NNP I-NP
|
|
plunge NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
realized VBD B-VP
|
|
these DT B-NP
|
|
problems NNS I-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
unique JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
New NNP B-NP
|
|
York NNP I-NP
|
|
stocks NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC B-ADJP
|
|
not RB I-ADJP
|
|
directly RB B-ADJP
|
|
related VBN I-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
Tokyo NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
continued VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
gain VB I-VP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
rest NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
adding VBG B-VP
|
|
1017.69 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
four CD B-NP
|
|
days NNS I-NP
|
|
-- : O
|
|
more JJR B-VP
|
|
than IN I-VP
|
|
erasing VBG I-VP
|
|
Monday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
losses NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
But CC O
|
|
further JJ B-NP
|
|
major JJ I-NP
|
|
advances NNS I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Nikkei NNP I-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
foreseen VBN I-VP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
market NN B-NP
|
|
observers NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Investors NNS B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
still RB I-VP
|
|
waiting VBG I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
see VB I-VP
|
|
how WRB B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
government NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
decide VB I-VP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
interest NN B-NP
|
|
rates NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
how WRB B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
dollar NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
stabilized VBN I-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Some DT B-NP
|
|
high-priced JJ I-NP
|
|
issues NNS I-NP
|
|
made VBD B-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
comeback NN I-NP
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Pioneer NNP B-NP
|
|
surged VBD B-VP
|
|
450 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
-LRB- ( O
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
3.16 CD I-NP
|
|
-RRB- ) O
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
6,050 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
-LRB- ( O
|
|
$ $ B-NP
|
|
42.60 CD I-NP
|
|
-RRB- ) O
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Kyocera NNP B-NP
|
|
advanced VBD B-VP
|
|
80 CD B-NP
|
|
yen NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
5,440 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Fanuc NNP B-NP
|
|
gained VBD B-VP
|
|
100 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
7,580 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Breweries NNP B-NP
|
|
attracted VBD B-VP
|
|
investors NNS B-NP
|
|
because IN B-PP
|
|
of IN I-PP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
land NN I-NP
|
|
property NN I-NP
|
|
holdings NNS I-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
could MD B-VP
|
|
figure VB I-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
development NN B-NP
|
|
or CC O
|
|
other JJ B-NP
|
|
plans NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
traders NNS B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Sapporo NNP B-NP
|
|
gained VBD B-VP
|
|
80 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
1,920 CD B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Kirin NNP B-NP
|
|
added VBD B-VP
|
|
60 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
2,070 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Housings NNS B-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
constructions NNS I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
pharmaceuticals NNS I-NP
|
|
continued VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
bought VBN I-VP
|
|
following VBG B-PP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
gains NNS I-NP
|
|
because IN B-PP
|
|
of IN I-PP
|
|
strong JJ B-NP
|
|
earnings NNS I-NP
|
|
outlooks NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Daiwa NNP B-NP
|
|
House NNP I-NP
|
|
gained VBD B-VP
|
|
50 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
2,660 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Misawa NNP B-NP
|
|
Homes NNP I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
up IN B-ADVP
|
|
20 CD B-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
2,960 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Kajima NNP B-NP
|
|
advanced VBD B-VP
|
|
40 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
2,120 CD B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Ohbayashi NNP B-NP
|
|
added VBD B-VP
|
|
50 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
1,730 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Fujisawa NNP B-NP
|
|
added VBD B-VP
|
|
80 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
2,010 CD B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Mochida NNP B-NP
|
|
advanced VBD B-VP
|
|
230 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
4,400 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
London JJ B-NP
|
|
share NN I-NP
|
|
prices NNS I-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
influenced VBN I-VP
|
|
largely RB B-ADVP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
declines NNS B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
Wall NNP B-NP
|
|
Street NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
weakness NN B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
British JJ I-NP
|
|
pound NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
key JJ I-NP
|
|
Financial NNP I-NP
|
|
Times-Stock NNP I-NP
|
|
Exchange NNP I-NP
|
|
100-share JJ I-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
ended VBD B-VP
|
|
10.2 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADVP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
2179.1 CD B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
above IN B-ADVP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
intraday JJ I-NP
|
|
low NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
2176.9 CD B-NP
|
|
, , B-ADVP
|
|
but CC I-ADVP
|
|
off IN B-ADVP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
's POS I-NP
|
|
high NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
2189 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
finished VBD B-VP
|
|
2.4 CD B-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
under IN B-PP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
close NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
2233.9 CD B-NP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
previous JJ I-NP
|
|
Friday NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
although IN B-SBAR
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
recouped VBD B-VP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
sharp JJ I-NP
|
|
losses NNS I-NP
|
|
staged VBD B-VP
|
|
early JJ B-NP
|
|
last JJ I-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
back RB I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Wall NNP B-NP
|
|
Street NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
fall NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
London NNP B-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
weak JJ B-ADJP
|
|
throughout IN B-PP
|
|
Friday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
trading NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
however RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
what WP B-NP
|
|
dealers NNS B-NP
|
|
attributed VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
generally RB B-NP
|
|
thin JJ I-NP
|
|
interest NN I-NP
|
|
ahead RB B-ADVP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
weekend NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
's POS I-NP
|
|
potentially RB B-ADJP
|
|
important JJ I-ADJP
|
|
U.K. NNP B-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
September NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
FT-SE NNP I-NP
|
|
100 CD I-NP
|
|
largely RB B-ADVP
|
|
remained VBD B-VP
|
|
within IN B-PP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
11-point JJ I-NP
|
|
range NN I-NP
|
|
establshed VBN B-VP
|
|
within IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
first JJ I-NP
|
|
hour NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
trading NN B-NP
|
|
before IN B-PP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
eased VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
intraday JJ I-NP
|
|
low JJ I-NP
|
|
late RB B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
session NN I-NP
|
|
when WRB B-ADVP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
flurry NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
program NN B-NP
|
|
selling VBG I-NP
|
|
pushed VBN B-VP
|
|
Wall NNP B-NP
|
|
Street NNP I-NP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
FT NNP I-NP
|
|
30-share JJ I-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
11.0 CD B-NP
|
|
points NNS I-NP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADVP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
1761.0 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Volume NN B-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
extremely RB B-ADJP
|
|
thin JJ I-ADJP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
351.3 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
lightest JJS I-NP
|
|
volume NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
week NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
modestly RB B-ADVP
|
|
under IN B-PP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
387.4 CD I-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Dealers NNS B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
action NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
featureless JJ B-ADJP
|
|
outside IN B-PP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
response NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
sterling NN B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
early JJ I-NP
|
|
weakness NN I-NP
|
|
against IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
mark NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
and CC O
|
|
fears NNS B-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
Wall NNP B-NP
|
|
Street NNP I-NP
|
|
might MD B-VP
|
|
open RB I-VP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADVP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
strong JJ I-NP
|
|
leap NN I-NP
|
|
forward RB B-ADVP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
They PRP B-NP
|
|
added VBD B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
market-makers NNS B-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
largely RB I-VP
|
|
sidelined VBN I-VP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
aggressively RB B-VP
|
|
supporting VBG I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
quest NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
cover VB I-VP
|
|
internal JJ B-NP
|
|
shortages NNS I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
FT-SE NNP B-NP
|
|
100 CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Interest NN B-NP
|
|
may MD B-VP
|
|
remain VB I-VP
|
|
limited JJ B-ADJP
|
|
into IN B-PP
|
|
tomorrow NN B-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
U.K. NNP I-NP
|
|
trade NN I-NP
|
|
figures NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
market NN I-NP
|
|
will MD B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
watching VBG I-VP
|
|
closely RB B-ADVP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
see VB I-VP
|
|
if IN B-SBAR
|
|
there EX B-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
any DT B-NP
|
|
improvement NN I-NP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
disappointing JJ B-NP
|
|
numbers NNS I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
previous JJ I-NP
|
|
two CD I-NP
|
|
months NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
key JJ I-NP
|
|
corporate JJ I-NP
|
|
news NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
British JJ B-NP
|
|
Airways NNPS I-NP
|
|
decided VBD B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
withdraw VB I-VP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
management-led JJ I-NP
|
|
bid NN I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
UAL NNP B-NP
|
|
Corp. NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
parent NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
United NNP B-NP
|
|
Airlines NNPS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
British JJ B-NP
|
|
Airways NNPS I-NP
|
|
rose VBD B-VP
|
|
initially RB B-ADVP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
announcing VBG B-VP
|
|
its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
withdrawal NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
UAL NNP I-NP
|
|
deal NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Dealers NNS B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
they PRP B-NP
|
|
viewed VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT O
|
|
initial JJ O
|
|
# # O
|
|
390-million CD O
|
|
-LRB- ( O
|
|
$ $ B-ADJP
|
|
622 CD O
|
|
million CD O
|
|
-RRB- ) O
|
|
outlay NN B-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
15 CD I-NP
|
|
% NN I-NP
|
|
stake NN I-NP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
airline NN I-NP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
bit NN I-NP
|
|
much JJ I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Its PRP$ B-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
slid VBD B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
late JJ B-NP
|
|
dealings NNS I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
close VB I-VP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
penny NN I-NP
|
|
per IN B-PP
|
|
share NN B-NP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADVP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
197 CD B-NP
|
|
pence NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
airline NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
most RBS I-NP
|
|
active JJ I-NP
|
|
FT-SE NNP I-NP
|
|
100 CD I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
8.2 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
traded VBN B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
next JJ I-NP
|
|
most RBS I-NP
|
|
active JJ I-NP
|
|
top-tier JJ I-NP
|
|
stock NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
B.A.T NNP B-NP
|
|
Industries NNPS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
target NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
Sir NNP B-NP
|
|
James NNP I-NP
|
|
Goldsmith NNP I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
# # B-ADJP
|
|
13.4 CD O
|
|
billion CD O
|
|
bid NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
company NN I-NP
|
|
gained VBD B-VP
|
|
shareholder NN B-NP
|
|
approval NN I-NP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
restructure VB I-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
bid NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
fend VB I-VP
|
|
off IN B-PRT
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
hostile JJ I-NP
|
|
takeover NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Sir NNP B-NP
|
|
James NNP I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Thursday NNP B-NP
|
|
night NN I-NP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
plans NNS I-NP
|
|
for IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
takeover NN I-NP
|
|
had VBD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
changed VBN I-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
B.A.T NNP B-NP
|
|
ended VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
day NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
778 CD B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
down JJ B-ADVP
|
|
5 NN B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
turnover NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
7.5 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Dealers NNS B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
hit VBN I-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
some DT B-NP
|
|
profit-taking NN I-NP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
gains NNS B-NP
|
|
since IN B-PP
|
|
mid-week NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
In IN B-PP
|
|
other JJ B-NP
|
|
active JJ I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Trusthouse NNP B-NP
|
|
Forte NNP I-NP
|
|
shed VB B-VP
|
|
10 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
294 CD B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
volume NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
6.4 CD B-NP
|
|
million CD I-NP
|
|
shares NNS I-NP
|
|
after IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
Barclays NNP I-NP
|
|
De NNP I-NP
|
|
Zoete NNP I-NP
|
|
Wedd NNP I-NP
|
|
downgrading NN I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
while IN B-SBAR
|
|
Hillsdown NNP B-NP
|
|
Holdings NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
food NN I-NP
|
|
products NNS I-NP
|
|
concern VBP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
boosted VBN I-VP
|
|
2 CD B-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
271 CD B-NP
|
|
after IN O
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
disclosed VBD B-VP
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
would MD B-VP
|
|
seek VB I-VP
|
|
shareholder NN B-NP
|
|
approval NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
begin VB I-VP
|
|
share NN B-NP
|
|
repurchases NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Elsewhere RB B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Europe NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
share NN B-NP
|
|
prices NNS I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
higher JJR B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Stockholm NNP B-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
Brussels NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Milan NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Prices NNS B-NP
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADJP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Frankfurt NNP B-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
Zurich NNP I-NP
|
|
, , I-NP
|
|
Paris NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC I-NP
|
|
Amsterdam NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
South JJ B-NP
|
|
African JJ I-NP
|
|
gold NN I-NP
|
|
stocks NNS I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
moderately RB B-ADVP
|
|
lower JJR I-ADVP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Share NN B-NP
|
|
prices NNS I-NP
|
|
closed VBD B-VP
|
|
higher JJR B-ADVP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Sydney NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Taipei NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Wellington NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Manila NNP B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Hong NNP B-NP
|
|
Kong NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
Singapore NNP B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
were VBD B-VP
|
|
lower JJR B-ADJP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
Seoul NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Here RB B-ADVP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
price NN B-NP
|
|
trends NNS I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
world NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
major JJ I-NP
|
|
stock NN I-NP
|
|
markets NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
as IN B-SBAR
|
|
calculated VBN B-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
Morgan NNP B-NP
|
|
Stanley NNP I-NP
|
|
Capital NNP I-NP
|
|
International NNP I-NP
|
|
Perspective NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Geneva NNP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
To TO B-VP
|
|
make VB I-VP
|
|
them PRP B-NP
|
|
directly RB B-ADJP
|
|
comparable JJ I-ADJP
|
|
, , O
|
|
each DT B-NP
|
|
index NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
based VBN I-VP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
close NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
1969 CD B-NP
|
|
equaling VBG B-VP
|
|
100 CD B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
percentage NN I-NP
|
|
change NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
since IN B-PP
|
|
year-end NN B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
required VBN I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
notify VB I-VP
|
|
foreign JJ B-NP
|
|
dictators NNS I-NP
|
|
if IN B-SBAR
|
|
it PRP B-NP
|
|
knows VBZ B-VP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
coup NN B-NP
|
|
plans NNS I-NP
|
|
likely JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
endanger VB I-VP
|
|
their PRP$ B-NP
|
|
lives NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
government NN B-NP
|
|
officials NNS I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
notification NN I-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
part NN B-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
set NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
guidelines NNS B-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
handling NN B-VP
|
|
coups NNS B-NP
|
|
outlined VBN B-VP
|
|
in IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
secret JJ I-NP
|
|
1988 CD I-NP
|
|
exchange NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
letters NNS B-NP
|
|
between IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Reagan NNP I-NP
|
|
administration NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
Senate NNP I-NP
|
|
Intelligence NNP I-NP
|
|
Committee NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
existence NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
guidelines NNS I-NP
|
|
has VBZ B-VP
|
|
become VBN I-VP
|
|
known VBN I-VP
|
|
since IN B-SBAR
|
|
President NNP B-NP
|
|
Bush NNP I-NP
|
|
disclosed VBD B-VP
|
|
them PRP B-NP
|
|
privately RB B-ADVP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
seven CD B-NP
|
|
Republican NNP I-NP
|
|
senators NNS I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
White NNP I-NP
|
|
House NNP I-NP
|
|
meeting NN I-NP
|
|
last JJ B-NP
|
|
Monday NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
Officials NNS B-NP
|
|
familiar JJ B-ADJP
|
|
with IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
meeting NN I-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Bush NNP I-NP
|
|
cited VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
policy NN I-NP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
an DT B-NP
|
|
example NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
sort NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
congressional JJ B-NP
|
|
requirements NNS I-NP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
administration NN I-NP
|
|
contends VBZ B-VP
|
|
contribute VB B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
failure NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|
|
such JJ B-NP
|
|
covert JJ I-NP
|
|
actions NNS I-NP
|
|
as IN B-PP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
month NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
futile JJ I-NP
|
|
effort NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
oust VB I-VP
|
|
Panamanian JJ B-NP
|
|
dictator NN I-NP
|
|
Manuel NNP I-NP
|
|
Noriega NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
According VBG B-PP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
officials NNS I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Bush NNP I-NP
|
|
even RB B-ADVP
|
|
read VB B-VP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
senators NNS I-NP
|
|
selections NNS B-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
highly RB I-NP
|
|
classified VBN I-NP
|
|
letter NN I-NP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
committee NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
White NNP I-NP
|
|
House NNP I-NP
|
|
discussing VBG B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
guidelines NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
They PRP B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
president NN I-NP
|
|
conceded VBD B-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
notification NN I-NP
|
|
requirement NN I-NP
|
|
did VBD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
affect VB I-VP
|
|
his PRP$ B-NP
|
|
decision NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
lend VB I-VP
|
|
only RB B-NP
|
|
minor JJ I-NP
|
|
support NN I-NP
|
|
to TO B-PP
|
|
this DT B-NP
|
|
month NN I-NP
|
|
's POS B-NP
|
|
Panama NNP I-NP
|
|
coup NN I-NP
|
|
effort NN I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
No DT B-NP
|
|
notification NN I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
ever RB I-VP
|
|
considered VBN I-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
officials NNS B-NP
|
|
said VBD B-VP
|
|
, , O
|
|
apparently RB B-ADVP
|
|
because IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
U.S. NNP I-NP
|
|
did VBD B-VP
|
|
n't RB I-VP
|
|
think VB I-VP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
coup NN I-NP
|
|
plotters NNS I-NP
|
|
intended VBN B-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
kill VB I-VP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Noriega NNP I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
but CC O
|
|
merely RB B-VP
|
|
sought VBD I-VP
|
|
to TO I-VP
|
|
imprison VB I-VP
|
|
him PRP B-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
What WP B-NP
|
|
's VBZ B-VP
|
|
more JJR B-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
both DT B-NP
|
|
administration NN B-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
congressional JJ B-NP
|
|
officials NNS I-NP
|
|
hint VBP B-VP
|
|
that IN B-SBAR
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
notification NN I-NP
|
|
requirement NN I-NP
|
|
is VBZ B-VP
|
|
likely JJ B-ADJP
|
|
to TO B-VP
|
|
be VB I-VP
|
|
dropped VBN I-VP
|
|
from IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
guidelines NNS I-NP
|
|
on IN B-PP
|
|
coup NN B-NP
|
|
attempts NNS I-NP
|
|
that WDT B-NP
|
|
are VBP B-VP
|
|
being VBG I-VP
|
|
rewritten VBN I-VP
|
|
by IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
panel NN I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
White NNP I-NP
|
|
House NNP I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
The DT B-NP
|
|
rewriting VBG I-NP
|
|
was VBD B-VP
|
|
launched VBN I-VP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
meeting NN I-NP
|
|
between IN B-PP
|
|
Mr. NNP B-NP
|
|
Bush NNP I-NP
|
|
and CC O
|
|
intelligence NN B-NP
|
|
committee NN I-NP
|
|
leaders NNS I-NP
|
|
Oct. NNP B-NP
|
|
12 CD I-NP
|
|
, , O
|
|
a DT B-NP
|
|
few JJ I-NP
|
|
days NNS I-NP
|
|
before IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
meeting NN I-NP
|
|
at IN B-PP
|
|
which WDT B-NP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
president NN I-NP
|
|
complained VBD B-VP
|
|
about IN B-PP
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
rules NNS I-NP
|
|
. . O
|
|
|
|
However RB B-ADVP
|
|
, , O
|
|
the DT B-NP
|
|
disclosure NN I-NP
|
|
of IN B-PP
|