Currently, for each C++ operator class definition, there registers a *gradient operator creator* function, which takes a C++ operator instance and returns the corresponding gradient operator instance.
Currently, for each C++ operator class definition, a *gradient operator creator* function is registered, which takes as input a C++ operator instance and returns the corresponding gradient operator instance.
However, we noticed two problems with the current deisgn:
However, we noticed two problems with the current design:
1. As we decided to separate the *compilation* and *execution* phases, we need to change the creator to take an `OpDesc` protobuf message in a `ProgramDesc` and inserts corresponding `OpDesc` messages into the `ProgramDesc` message.
1. As we decided to separate the *compilation* and the *execution* phases, we need to change the creator to take an `OpDesc` protobuf message in a `ProgramDesc` and inserts corresponding `OpDesc` messages into the `ProgramDesc` message.
1. Some operator's gradient computation requires more than one gradient operators. For example, the gradient of *minus* consists of two operators -- an identity operaotr and a scale operator. So we need to make the registration mechanism to support the mapping from an operator to a set of operators for gradient computation.
1. For some operators, the gradient computation can be written in terms of existing operators. For example, the gradient of *minus* operator consists of two operators -- an *identity* operator followed by a *scale* operator. Hence the registration mechanism needs to support mapping from an operator to a set of operators for the gradient computation.
## The Current Implementation
## The Current Implementation
The C++ class `OpInfos` store in a association map which key is the operator type. The `grad_op_type` indicate associated gradient operator type. Operator can create gradient operator by `OpInfo::creator_` of gradient. The pseudo code is
Instances of the C++ class `OpInfo` are stored an associative map whose key is the operator type. The `grad_op_type` indicates the associated gradient operator type. An operator can create the gradient operator by invoking `OpInfo::creator_` of the gradient operator. The pseudo code is as follows
The function takes an `OpDescBind` of the forward operator and returns one or many gradient operator descriptions. `OpDescBind` is a C++ wrapper for protobuf message `OpDesc` to manipulate `OpDesc` fast.
The function takes an `OpDescBind` of the forward operator and returns one or many gradient operator descriptions. `OpDescBind` is a C++ wrapper for the protobuf message `OpDesc` for rapid manipulation of `OpDesc`.
The `GradOpDescMaker` will be registered in `OpInfo`, to replace `grad_op_type_` field. The `OpInfo` should be
The `GradOpDescMaker` will be registered in `OpInfo` and will replace the `grad_op_type_` field. The `OpInfo` should look like
```cpp
```cpp
struct OpInfo {
struct OpInfo {
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ struct OpInfo {
};
};
```
```
The `grad_op_maker_ ` is `nullptr` if the operator does not have associated gradient operators.
The `grad_op_maker_ ` is a `nullptr` if the operator does not have any associated gradient operators.
We propose a base class called `GradOpDescMakerBase` to let operator developers generate `Gradient Operators` easily. The public interface of that class is
We propose a base class called `GradOpDescMakerBase` to let operator developers generate `Gradient Operators` easily. The public interface of that class is
We can write many helper functions since the `GradOpDescMakerBase` is a class now. The basic helper functions get the variables of `Input`, `Output`, `InputGradient` and `OutputGradient` in the forwarding operator.
We can write many helper functions since the `GradOpDescMakerBase` is a class now. The basic helper functions get the variables of `Input`, `Output`, `InputGradient` and `OutputGradient` in the forwarding operator.
We should chagne register macros at the same time. In the current solution, there is no difference between forwarding operators and backward operators. So `REGISTER_OP` just register one operator. If the `REGISTER_OPERATOR ` contains `OpProtoAndCheckerMaker` and `GradOpDescMaker`, we just list them in the same macro. It can be done by a macro contains `__VA_ARGS__`.
We should change register macros at the same time. In the current solution, there is no difference between forwarding operators and backward operators. So `REGISTER_OP` just register one operator. If the `REGISTER_OPERATOR ` contains `OpProtoAndCheckerMaker` and `GradOpDescMaker`, we just list them in the same macro. It can be done by a macro contains `__VA_ARGS__`.
dangqingqing
8 years ago